AI marking uses artificial intelligence to assess student work against official curriculum criteria and exam board mark schemes. It provides instant, structured feedback including grades, strengths, areas for improvement, and examiner-style commentary — just like a qualified teacher would.

How does ReMarkAble AI work?

Upload a photo of handwritten work or paste typed text, select your subject and exam board, and ReMarkAble AI analyses it against the relevant mark scheme. Within seconds you receive a detailed assessment with grades, Assessment Objective breakdowns, and personalised improvement suggestions.

Is ReMarkAble AI free?

Yes. ReMarkAble AI offers a free plan that includes curriculum-aligned feedback for GCSE, A-Level, KS1, KS2 and 11+ subjects. Premium plans with unlimited assessments and PDF exports are available from £9.99 per month.

What subjects does ReMarkAble AI cover?

ReMarkAble AI covers a wide range of subjects across GCSE and A-Level including English Language, English Literature, History, Geography, Religious Studies, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and more. It supports AQA, Edexcel, OCR and WJEC exam boards.

Does this replace the teacher?

No. ReMarkAble AI proposes a mark, a standard and feedback grounded in the mark scheme — a teacher confirms or overrides it. In school marking, nothing is released to a student until a teacher has approved it, and if a teacher overrides a judgement the AI original is kept alongside it for audit.

Can it really read my child's handwriting?

Yes — that is the point of it. Photograph the page as it is, handwritten and unedited, across up to five pages. There is no typing up and no transcribing: GCSEs, A-Levels and primary writing are still done by hand, so the work is assessed in the form it was actually produced.

How does it mark primary writing?

Primary writing is not given a GCSE grade. It is judged against the Teacher Assessment Framework for that year group — Working Towards, Expected or Greater Depth — with evidence quoted against the “pupil can” statements, plus a next step to practise. Years 1 to 6 each use their own year-group expectations.

Does it follow the DfE guidance on AI in schools?

Yes. The Department for Education publishes guidance for schools and colleges on using generative AI, built on five principles: data protection, safety and safeguarding, ethical use and transparency, keeping a human in the loop, and accuracy. ReMarkAble AI was built against all five — a qualified teacher remains the final authority on every grade, student work is never used to train public AI models, and every report carries a clear AI-generation disclaimer. We publish how we meet each principle in full on our Using AI in Education Settings page.

Is student work kept safe?

The platform serves children from age 5 to 18 and is built for that. Work is stored against your account under UK GDPR, is never used to train public models, and is visible only to you — or, in a school, to the staff with access to that class.

KS1 to A-Level

Handwritten work, marked before the lesson ends.

Photograph a page of real handwriting. Get marks against the actual paper — or a TAF standard for primary writing — with quoted evidence and one next step worth teaching. Usually in under a minute.

Mark a piece free See a marked example

Marking a whole class? See it for schools

Teachers confirm or override every mark — aligned to DfE guidance. Free to start, no card required.

GCSE English Language — Paper 2: Writers' viewpoints and perspectives — Q4

Grade9

15/ 16

Live marked example · AQA Response A

Strengths

You compare both sources directly and repeatedly, rather than writing about them separately.
You analyse methods with relevant terminology, such as 'semantic field', 'personifies', and 'direct address'.

Next Step

Link the two writers more explicitly within each paragraph — whereas, similarly, in contrast.

See a marked example

“ReMarkAble AI has transformed how we mark and feed back across the school. It's a game-changer.”

Mrs Bryant — Deputy Headteacher

KS1–A-Level: One platform, every stage
AQA · Edexcel · OCR · WJEC: Mark schemes retrieved at marking time
Under a minute: Typical wait for a full report
Teacher-confirmed: Every mark can be overridden

Sound familiar?

Writing is the work that takes longest to mark — and gets the thinnest feedback.

Extended writing is still handwritten, from a Year 2 recount to an A-Level essay. It is the slowest thing in the pile, so it is the thing that gets a tick and a sentence.

The marking comes back days later

By the time the book is returned, the question has gone from the student's head — and from the teacher's evening.

The comment is “develop your analysis”

True, and unusable. Nobody can act on feedback that doesn't quote the line it is talking about.

Nobody knows where the marks went

Not the student, not the parent, and not always the next teacher — because the standard was never written down in the same language twice.

ReMarkAble AI reads the handwriting as it is, marks it against the real scheme, quotes the evidence, and names one next step — while the piece is still fresh. A teacher confirms it.

Find the version built for you

The same marking engine, framed in the language you already use — Assessment Objectives, TAF standards, or just “is this any good?”

Students

See exactly where the marks went

Upload the answer you actually handwrote. Get marks against the Assessment Objectives, the lines that earned them, and what to fix before the next paper.

Mark an answer free How it works for students

Parents

Know where they stand, in plain English

Photograph a piece of writing. Get the standard — Working Towards, Expected, Greater Depth, or a GCSE grade — plus one thing to practise. No teaching qualification needed.

Mark a piece free How it works for parents

Tutors

Arrive already knowing what to teach

Set work between sessions and let the marking happen before you sit down. Start the hour on teaching the gap instead of finding it.

Mark between sessions How it works for tutors

Schools & teachers

Give the feedback without taking the evening

Mark a whole class against the same standard, keep the language consistent across the department, and hold a record of progress you can moderate from.

See it for schools

The loop

From a photo of a page to the next lesson

Three steps, usually under a minute. The same loop whether it is a Year 2 recount or an A-Level essay.

1
Photograph the page
Handwritten or typed, one page or five. No transcribing, no retyping — the work is read as it was written, in the order it was written.
2
Read the report
Marks against the paper and question, or a TAF standard for primary writing. Every judgement quotes the line it came from, so you can check it rather than trust it.
3
Teach or practise the next step
One named gap, not a list of twelve. Each piece stays in the history, so you can see whether the standard is actually moving.

See a real GCSE report, marked on the product

See it in action

From handwriting to feedback while you wait

Upload a photo of your work, pick your exam board and paper, and get a detailed assessment with grades, strengths, and next steps — usually under a minute. Or open a live GCSE English Language report marked on the product.

Try it free See a marked example

GCSE English Language — Paper 2: Writers' viewpoints and perspectives — Q4

Grade9

15/ 16

Live marked example · AQA Response A

Strengths

You compare both sources directly and repeatedly, rather than writing about them separately.
You analyse methods with relevant terminology, such as 'semantic field', 'personifies', and 'direct address'.
You support your points with well-chosen quotations from both texts.

Next Step

Link the two writers more explicitly within each paragraph — whereas, similarly, in contrast.

See a marked example

What you actually get back

Not a score and a smiley face. A marked piece you could defend in a moderation meeting.

Fix it while it is still fresh

Feedback lands in under a minute, not next week — so the student is still holding the question they got wrong.

Evidence, not adjectives

Every strength and every next step quotes the line it came from. That is the difference between feedback you can act on and feedback you can only agree with.

The actual mark scheme

AQA, Edexcel, OCR, Eduqas and WJEC schemes are retrieved at marking time, per subject and paper. Primary writing is judged against the Teacher Assessment Framework for that year.

A teacher has the last word

Marks are proposed, never imposed. Anything a teacher overrides is kept alongside the original, so the judgement is auditable.

A record that shows movement

Each piece stays in the history with its standard and next step, so progress is something you can see rather than something you remember.

The same standard, every time

The tenth script at 9pm is judged the same way as the first at 4pm — which is what makes the language consistent across a class, a department or a trust.

For schools and departments

Mark the set, moderate it, then release it.

Primary writing or GCSE scripts, marked as a class against the same standard. Teachers confirm or override every judgement before a single student sees it — and the record stays, so you are not rebuilding evidence in June.

Built against the DfE's guidance on generative AI in education settings. See how we meet each of the five principles.

A whole class in one go

Attach the class's scripts against a paper and send the set to be marked. Come back to a batch, not a queue you have to babysit.

Moderate, then release

Every proposed mark, grade and comment can be overridden before anything reaches a student. The AI original is kept alongside your version for audit.

One language across the department

The same AO wording, or the same WTS / EXS / GDS wording, on every piece — which is what makes a moderation meeting short.

Teachers stay the final authority

Nothing is published to a student until a teacher has approved it. That is enforced in the product, not promised in a policy.

Set up your school in two minutes Request a demo

Primary, secondary, sixth form, college or trust →

School plans from £49/month or £500/year. Prices exclude VAT where applicable. See school pricing.

Already know your phase? Primary · Secondary · Multi-academy trusts · School pricing

Department for Education guidance

Built to the framework your school is already held to

The DfE publishes guidance for schools and colleges on using generative AI. We built ReMarkAble AI against its five principles rather than around them — and we set out, publicly and in detail, how the product meets each one.

Human in the loop
A qualified teacher stays the final authority on every grade.
Data protection
Student work is never used to train public AI models.
Safety & safeguarding
Content filtering, with teacher oversight before anything is final.
Transparency
Every report carries a clear AI-generation disclaimer.
Accuracy & reliability
Calibrated against official mark schemes and government exemplars.

Read our full DfE alignment The DfE guidance itself, on GOV.UK

Curriculum Coverage

From first sentences to advanced essays — we support every stage of the writing journey

KS1

Give KS1 teachers time back with TAF-aligned next steps they can confirm.

KS2 student practising writing assessment

KS2

Give KS2 teachers consistent TAF feedback and a record of progress they can act on.

11-Plus

Prepare pupils for selective school entry with targeted writing assessment.

GCSE

Instant AI marking aligned to GCSE English Language specifications, including structure and SPaG.

A-Level

Support advanced learners with detailed feedback on structure, argument development, and critical analysis.

What Our Community Says

Hear from teachers, students, parents, and school leaders who use ReMarkAble AI every day

"The AI marked our mocks faster than anything we've used before — and the feedback matched examiner reports."

Maya

GCSE Student

"Our English department used this for moderation — every script had consistent, clear feedback."

Mr Shah

Head of English

"It helped me improve my structure and clarity before my A-Level English exam."

Emma

A-Level Student

"ReMarkAble AI has transformed how we mark and feed back across the school. It's a game-changer."

Mrs Bryant

Deputy Headteacher

"The breakdown really helped my son understand what to work on. It's so clear — even for us as parents."

James R.

Parent

"I liked how it showed me where I did well and gave a new version of my story."

Liam

KS2 Pupil

"It's perfect for identifying gaps in writing early on. Our Year 1 pupils responded really positively."

Miss Green

KS1 Teacher

"We use it across the trust to support moderation and data drops. It saves days of work."

Mr Hamilton

Trust Leader

"The AI marked our mocks faster than anything we've used before — and the feedback matched examiner reports."

Maya

GCSE Student

"Our English department used this for moderation — every script had consistent, clear feedback."

Mr Shah

Head of English

"It helped me improve my structure and clarity before my A-Level English exam."

Emma

A-Level Student

"ReMarkAble AI has transformed how we mark and feed back across the school. It's a game-changer."

Mrs Bryant

Deputy Headteacher

"The breakdown really helped my son understand what to work on. It's so clear — even for us as parents."

James R.

Parent

"I liked how it showed me where I did well and gave a new version of my story."

Liam

KS2 Pupil

"It's perfect for identifying gaps in writing early on. Our Year 1 pupils responded really positively."

Miss Green

KS1 Teacher

"We use it across the trust to support moderation and data drops. It saves days of work."

Mr Hamilton

Trust Leader

Swipe to see more

Mark one piece and see for yourself

Photograph a page of handwriting and read the report it comes back with. Free to start, three assessments every 30 days, no card required.

Mark a piece free See how it works

What Is AI Marking?

AI marking is the use of artificial intelligence to assess student work against curriculum criteria and return structured feedback — including grades, strengths, areas for improvement, and examiner-style commentary. Unlike generic grammar checkers, AI marking tools like ReMarkAble AI retrieve official mark schemes from exam boards such as AQA, Edexcel, OCR, and WJEC, enabling them to evaluate extended writing in the same way a qualified examiner would.

According to the Department for Education's 2024 Teacher Workload Survey, teachers in England spend an average of 8.7 hours per week on marking and assessment — making it the single largest non-teaching demand on their time. AI marking addresses this by providing instant, curriculum-aligned feedback on handwritten or typed student work, allowing teachers to focus on teaching and students to receive timely feedback that drives improvement.

8.7 hrs/week

Average teacher time on marking

Source: DfE Workload Survey 2024

5.3 million

GCSE entries in England (2025)

Source: Ofqual Annual Report 2025

Usually <1 min

AI feedback time vs days for teacher marking

Resources & Guides

Everything you need to understand AI marking and get the most from your revision

Handwritten work, marked before the lesson ends.