Every school in your trust gets the same marking loop — submit a class set, moderate, release, markbook, gaps and lessons — with teachers still the final authority. Trust-level reporting is on the roadmap; today we licence and support schools individually, with volume pricing for groups.
ReMarkAble turns a class set of work into reviewed feedback, a live markbook and evidence-led teaching actions — while the teacher keeps control of every judgement a pupil sees.
The marking agent cannot answer without retrieving the actual exam board mark scheme — and we count whether it did, after the run, rather than taking its word for it. Across all marking from July to 23 September 2026: 898 pieces marked, 896 recorded as grounded and none recorded as ungrounded.
Every piece of evidence in the feedback is matched back against the pupil's own transcript. Of 7,288 quotes, 6,885 verified automatically.
86 live mark scheme stores, 264 papers and 1,637 seeded questions with their marks, sections and assessment objectives — across AQA, Edexcel, OCR, Eduqas and WJEC, plus KS1, KS2, 11+ and Years 1–6.
Quote verification is fidelity against the pupil transcript, not a marking accuracy percentage. We do not publish one.
1. Submit the class, not the script
Choose the paper. Attach each pupil's work — photographed handwriting or typed. Submit once. Every script marks in parallel and you can close the tab; anything that stalls is swept up automatically.
2. Moderate on one screen
The class set arrives in one moderation board, not thirty separate reports. Approve what you agree with, override the marks, grades and feedback you don't. The original AI judgement is kept alongside yours for audit. Nothing is visible to a pupil until you release it.
3. The markbook fills itself
Marks, grades, percentages and trends land per pupil per paper without anyone typing anything into a spreadsheet. Shared gaps across the class are ranked for you, with the pupils affected already grouped.
We work with trusts school by school. Trust-level reporting is on the roadmap — we will not sell it as if it already ships.
Prefer to see one school working first? Secondary schools · Primary schools.
Every school leader buying AI assessment is really buying an answer to three questions: is it just guessing, who is accountable for the mark, and will the data stand up in a conversation with a governor or an inspector. Here is how ReMarkAble answers them.
Reporting you get today: termly KPIs (assessments, pupils assessed, below expected, improving, active teachers), half-term progress series, attainment bands, class reports, the intervention lifecycle, and a report catalogue that states plainly what each report can and cannot produce. School-level reports export as CSV. Individual assessment reports and lesson plans export as PDF.
Pick the paper, attach the scripts, submit. They mark in parallel and you can close the laptop.
Not thirty PDFs. Override what you disagree with, release together.
Marks, grades, percentages, trends — per pupil, per paper, no typing.
for the whole class or a single batch. Parents' evening and books in one action.
Shared weaknesses are ranked across the class, with the pupils affected, the severity and the supporting evidence. A gap has to reach half of an assessed cohort of at least five before we'll call it class-wide — because "your whole class needs this" off four scripts is how a tool loses a teacher for good.
Generate a teaching plan against the gaps your class actually has, then reassess.
Identify, group, teach, reassess — with each group's stage visible instead of a flat list.
Awaiting moderation, awaiting release, pupils below expectation, pupils declining, pupils not yet assessed.
Log a piece as independent, supported or heavily scaffolded for your moderation evidence. The marker never sees it, so it cannot bias the mark.
CSV, columns in any order. Pupil accounts are optional — you can mark work for children who have no login at all.
between years.
No independent reviewer benchmark exists for our marking yet, so any number we gave you would be marketing. What we can evidence is that every mark is grounded in the real mark scheme and every quote is checked against the pupil's work — and we publish those figures above.
The system produces a first mark. You decide what a pupil sees. That is the design, not a limitation of it.
We can show you the gap, the group and the teaching that followed. We cannot yet show you a clean before-and-after, so we don't pretend to.
We import your register from CSV, including the usual MIS export formats. That is not the same thing, and we won't say it is.
Teachers in every school remain the final authority on every judgement. Nothing reaches a pupil until a teacher releases it.
Prefer a single marked script first? See an AQA Paper 2 answer marked, no signup.
Trial the product on a real class, or talk to us about volume pricing across your group.
No card required. The trial ends on its own. School licences: from £120 per month for up to 120 licensed pupils. See school pricing.
Fourteen days. Up to 30 pupils and 100 assessments. No card, no automatic billing, nothing to cancel. Mark a real set of your own scripts, moderate it, and look at what the markbook does with it.
If you want to see it working before you commit even that, ask for the demo school — a real class in use, with data already in it.