Save marking time
Photograph the page. Confirm proposed marks and a next step instead of writing the same comments after class.
Photograph handwritten answers from large cohorts. Get proposed marks against the paper and question, consistent AO language, and a next step to teach. Teachers remain the final authority.
Not a replacement for teacher marking. A way to mark more answers, keep the language the same, and spend the time you save on teaching.
Photograph the page. Confirm proposed marks and a next step instead of writing the same comments after class.
The same paper, question and AO language across a year group — so standards do not drift between groups or sites.
Board-aligned marks on written A-Level work, with a progress trail students can act on between lessons.
Every proposed mark can be confirmed or overridden. The original is kept if you change it.
Students can practise between lessons and arrive already knowing what to work on.
Feedback names the next step in AO language, so the following lesson has a target.
The handwriting below is from AQA’s published Answers and commentaries for GCSE English Language 8700 Paper 2: Writers' viewpoints and perspectives (from 2026) — so you can see the full loop on a public collection, not a pupil’s book.
Paper
Question

1. Upload the answer
Handwritten pages are read as they are — no typing required. The paper and question set the mark scheme and assessment objectives, so the feedback is usable that afternoon.
GCSE English Language · Q4
Indicative grade 9
Compare perspectives · 94%
You compare both sources directly and repeatedly, rather than writing about them separately.
You analyse methods with relevant terminology, such as 'semantic field', 'personifies', and 'direct address'.
Link the two writers more explicitly within each paragraph — whereas, similarly, in contrast.
2. Online report
Marks against the question total, an indicative grade, strengths and a next step. Teachers confirm it. The same wording across a class makes department standardisation faster.

3. Compare with AQA
Question 4 and Question 5 sit in the Level 4 band AQA published. Question 2 was published as Level 3; we awarded 6/8, inside that published band. Teachers remain the final authority.
| Question | AQA published | ReMarkAble |
|---|---|---|
Q2 · Summary comparison Response B · 8 marks | Level 3 | 6/8 Sits in the published band |
Q4 · Compare perspectives Response A · 16 marks | Level 4 | 15/16 Sits in the published band |
Q5 · Transactional writing Response A · 40 marks | Level 4 | 37/40 Sits in the published band |
ReMarkAble AI
AQA 8700 Paper 2 · Q4
Indicative grade 9
Keep a copy for books, parents and the next time this student writes. AO marks and next steps stay with the piece.
4. A record of progress
Each marked page stays in the history. Premium PDF for books, parents and the next time you look at this student. You can see whether the marks and the next steps are moving.
GCSE English Language · Q5
Indicative grade 9
Transactional writing · 93%
Effective rhetorical opening with 'Ladies and gentlemen - we stand at a crossroads.'
Clear paragraphing and logical progression through three convincing arguments.
Develop a more memorable closing so the argument ends with a sharper final impact.
5. Teach the remaining gap
On this Question 5 speech the remaining gap was a sharper closing. On Question 4 it was linking the two writers inside each paragraph. The time you save on marking goes into teaching that next step — across a class, not one book at a time.
These three responses appear in AQA’s published answers and commentaries. We uploaded the handwriting to the live product — Q4 awarded 15/16 — so you can see upload, report and comparison without putting a pupil’s work on a public page.
Q2 · Summary comparison · AQA Level 3

GCSE English Language · Q2
Indicative grade 7
Summary comparison · 75%
You compare the sources directly rather than writing about them separately.
You make clear inferences from detail such as ‘sleeping car’ and ‘uncovered carriage’.
Keep each inference tightly linked to the evidence; avoid speculative comment.
Q4 · Compare perspectives · AQA Level 4

GCSE English Language · Q4
Indicative grade 9
Compare perspectives · 94%
You compare both sources directly and repeatedly, rather than writing about them separately.
You analyse methods with relevant terminology, such as 'semantic field', 'personifies', and 'direct address'.
Link the two writers more explicitly within each paragraph — whereas, similarly, in contrast.
Q5 · Transactional writing · AQA Level 4

GCSE English Language · Q5
Indicative grade 9
Transactional writing · 93%
Effective rhetorical opening with 'Ladies and gentlemen - we stand at a crossroads.'
Clear paragraphing and logical progression through three convincing arguments.
Develop a more memorable closing so the argument ends with a sharper final impact.
Handwritten responses and published levels are from AQA GCSE English Language (8700) Paper 2 Answers and commentaries (from 2026, v1.1 June 2025). ReMarkAble AI is not affiliated with or endorsed by AQA. Shown so departments can compare live marks with published exemplification, not a pupil’s book. See a live marked example.
“ReMarkAble AI has transformed how we mark and feed back across the school. It's a game-changer.”
Teachers confirm or override every proposed mark.
Self-serve in two minutes, or book a demo if you want to walk through it first.
School plans from £49/month or £500/year. Prices exclude VAT where applicable. See school pricing.